5.0 out of 5 stars
Terrifying
Reviewed in the United States on 17 December 2021
I would highly recommend Kennedy's book because if only a fraction of it is true, it’s a frightening indictment of the entire medical and pharmaceutical industry. But if the reader comes to the conclusion that wholesale corruption or something more sinister is at the heart of the Covid disaster, than he or she will have to acknowledge that, corruption of this magnitude doesn't exist in a vacuum. It has to be supported by a political bulwark that legislates to allow it, turns a blind eye to the atrocities it commits, and is in league with a Corporate media to hide it. If this is the case, then one has to assume that the death and injury of tens of thousands of American people in pursuit of some other ends aside from human health is criminal behavior of the highest order--crimes against humanity. However, if the information in the book is not true, it's one of the most outrageous slanders in the history of publishing.
NOTE: Regarding the vaccination of the very young: Very young children aren't at risk for Covid. Why the push to vaccinate them? the real reason, according to Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. is not to protect them, but to tie this generation into the global digital identity system that's over the horizon.
Kennedy's Claims:
o Anthony Fauci is an incompetent medical director who has never practiced medicine, and throughout his career, has colluded with pharmaceutical corporations to use unsafe, unproven drugs, for various illnesses, especially those to counter Covid 19 because the NIH holds interests in the patents.
o Fauci used "wildly inaccurate modeling that over-estimated US deaths by 525 percent."
o Fauci/CDC refused to follow-up on claimed vaccine injuries (each Covid patient was a financial asset--Medicare paid $39,000 per ventilator to hospitals)*
o Fauci refused to address the inadequacies of the HHS's dysfunctional vaccine injury surveillance system, VAERS.
o Fauci helped orchestrate the Corporate media black-out of discussion concerning key medical questions. They silenced doctors who offered alternative approaches to the pandemic and the doctors "who refused to pledge unquestioning faith in zero liability, shoddily tested, experimental vaccines." Fauci worked with Mark Zuckerberg and other social media sites to muzzle discussion of any alternative remedies.
o Best practices for stopping an infectious disease epidemic is through the application of certain procedures such as immediate quarantine of the sick, protection of the most vulnerable, immediate deployment of repurposed/off-label drugs and the use of early treatment protocols. Fauci did none of these. (Harvey Risch, Yale epidemiologist, leading global authority in clinical treatment protocols) Risch and many other health professionals attempted to counter Fauci's negligent decisions throughout the pandemic but was hindered by Corporate and social media censoring--even the by leading epidemiologists, physicians, and virologists.
o "Dr. Fauci made another inexplicable policy choice of not supplying the nursing homes with monoclonal antibodies where they might have saved thousands of lives," according to Dr. Risch. Because of Operation Warp Speed there were monoclonal antibodies which were approved by the FDA in November of 2020, long before there were any vaccines. Fauci should have ensured that nursing homes and quarantine hospitals had monoclonal antibodies. To quote: "It was a kind of staggering savage act of malpractice and negligence to deny this remedy to elder care facilities at a time when the elderly were dying at a rate of 10,000 per week."
o Fauci denied infected Americans early treatment, which, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, was "cruelty at a population level."
o By July 1, 2020, McCullough and his team had developed the first protocol based on signals of benefit and acceptable safety. It was published by the American Journal of Medicine. It was viewed by over a million people, with 122,000 downloads and is still considered the only trusted guide. Fauci didn't publish a single official treatment protocol prior to the one published by McCullough et al. This is another shocking omission on Fauci's part. Presently no journal will publish a new treatment protocol because of Fauci's interference. (The Chinese published their own protocol using, among other things, chloroquine, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and probiotics to stabilize and fortify the immune system.) McCullough states that the US could have done the same.
o By Autumn of 2020, over 200 studies supported treatment with hydroxychloroquine with 60 studies supported the use of ivermectin. Ivermectin is very inexpensive to produce, there are large quantities available, and it's very useful in stopping the replication processes of viruses. Bogus studies and other shoddy research was cobbled together by Fauci and associates that attempted to prove that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were dangerous. They did it in such a fashion that some of their patients in the tests died.
Case-in-point: In Detroit, rather than closing his practice (and having treated viral diseases for twenty-five years), Dr. David Brownstein and his staff treated patients with oral vitamins A, C, and D along with iodine (this was in the cars of the patients while they waited). The team used IV solutions outside all winter with a solution of hydrogen peroxide and vitamin C. They only rarely used ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They treated 715 patients and had ten hospitalizations and no deaths. **Early treatment was the key, especially with the use of ivermectin.
HERE'S THE KICKER and one of the most damning bits of evidence: When Dr. Brownstein and other doctors started talking publicly about their results with early treatment protocols they were silenced. Brownstein states: "When we talked about it, the whole cartel came for us. I've been in litigation with the Medical Board for a year. When we posted videos from some of our recovered patients, they went viral. One…had a million views. FTC filed a motion against us and we had to take everything down." In July 2020 Brownstein et al. published a peer-reviewed article describing their success with early treatment. The FTC sent him a warning letter to remove it from the public post.
DR. BROWNSTEIN'S CONCLUSION: "No one wanted Americans to know that you didn't have to die from COVID. It's 100 percent treatable. We proved it. No one had to die."
If indeed this is true, then one would have to surmise that an estimated 900,000 US citizens died for some sinister reason. (900,000 is the newest research figure available)
This is a sampling of Kennedy's book. If true, it is one of the most tragic periods of human history and an ominous warning for citizens throughout the world concerning the near future.
Conclusion: I don't know Kennedy personally. I don't know how honest, thorough, or professional his investigations are. I have no idea whether he's authentically concerned with vaccine safety and the wider issues regarding human health and welfare or if he's a "ringer,"--in Intelligence parlance, someone who is tasked to get ahead of the issue and "control the conversation." Regardless, any of his numerous footnotes can be researched and the original sources read. However, I've had questions of my own for two year that have never been adequately answered.
My Questions:
o In 2013, a moratorium was placed on the the creation of deadly viruses but gain-of-function research was the exception. Gain-of-function means that an engineered pathogen can jump from species to species (animal to human to animal). Infectious Disease researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill took surface proteins from the SHCO14 corona virus found in the Horseshoe bats native to China and combined it with a protein that causes respiratory illness in mice. Question: Are SARS, MERS, and Covid-19 the product of this research?
o There are over 400 bioweapons labs around the world that belong to the U.S. alone.
There have been publicized security breaches in various parts of the United States. A paper, published by the South China University of Technology (authors: Botao Xiao, Lei Xiao) states that the Wuhan Research lab was 300 yards (274.3 meters) from the Wuhan wet market. The lab had poor controls and lax administration and had over 600 diseased bats in residence.
Question: Did the virus escape from the lab into the wet market of Wuhan?
o In 2017 it was reported in Scientific American that the moratorium had been lifted by the Trump administration on manufactured, bioengineered pathogens that have gain-of-function capabilities. Question: Why?
o The Trump administration ended a $200,000,000 early-warning program for infectious disease, the Los Angeles Times reports. The program was designed to help scientists in China and other nations monitor and respond to disease threats. Question: Why was it discontinued?
o Why are the pharmaceuticals given full immunity from harms caused by their vaccines, while it's the tax payer who funds the Vaccine Court payouts?
o Question: Why is there such pressure to vaccinate the entire population without taking natural immunity into consideration, especially for children who are the least affected by the virus.
20 people found this helpful
