Amazon.com.au:Customer reviews: Inherent Vice
Skip to main content
.com.au
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Best Sellers Customer Service Today's Deals Prime New Releases Music Kindle Books Books Fashion Electronics Home Toys & Games Computers Gift Cards Video Games Beauty Home Improvement Health & Personal Care Sports, Fitness & Outdoors Audible Pet Supplies Automotive Gift Ideas Coupons Sell Subscribe & Save
Prime Video

  • Inherent Vice
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
172 global ratings
5 star
57%
4 star
21%
3 star
16%
2 star
4%
1 star
2%
Inherent Vice

Inherent Vice

byPaul Thomas Anderson
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
1 star only
Text, image, video
Filtered by
1 starClear filter
6 total ratings, 4 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From Australia

There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australiawith 1 star

From other countries

Lucas
1.0 out of 5 stars I regret ever watching this film
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 September 2017
Verified Purchase
Honestly, do not waste two and a half hours of your life on this pointless, unfunny and painfully slow film. I am a massive fan of several of Paul Thomas Anderson's previous films, with the exception of Hard Eight and the Master, but Inherent Vice is absolutely the worst of the lot.

I have read reviews that say "you'll get it if you read the book" and "you're not supposed to understand the plot"!!! What?! Why would someone actually make a film that has a plot not a single viewer can ever understand what happens at all? How can anyone involved in this film be proud of what they've done - which is deliberately deceive audiences by making this intentionally poor film without a distinguishable plot and no character depth at all and seeing how many "pretentious" people will buy it.

I was confused for the entirety of the 2 hours and 28 minute run time, however I was convinced that it was my fault for not getting it, so I stupidly carried on to the end. The film made absolutely no sense at all. I couldnt understand why so many characters were picked up and dropped and none of them had any real development or even context in the story. It started off promisingly with the kidnapping of his ex girlfriend and her new millionaire boyfriend, but after that I couldn't really tell you what happened. There were so many continuity errors and unexplained events and there was no arc to the story at all. There were a handful of actually really funny moments, but for a film this long that sparsity is really unforgivably appalling.

Some great acting performances, such as from Josh Brolin and Reese Witherspoon (although I don't really know what Witherspoon's relevance was in the film) were completely wasted here. Joaquin Phoenix was pretty annoying most of the way through as the main character whose name I have already forgotten. He had no clear motives or mindset towards anything he did throughout the entire film. There was no consistency in his relationships with the people around him. The dialogue consisted of mostly boring conversations that went on for way too long and didn't make any sense. Also, who were Owen Wilson and Benicio Del Toro's characters? I could not understand why either of them were in the film in the first place.

The script was self indulgent and unengaging and was largely instantly forgettable. I don't think I could tell you a single line of dialogue uttered by any of the countless actors. I was even shocked at how average the camerawork was. I would've expected that to be impressive at the very least from Paul Thomas Anderson.

I have never felt so strongly about disliking a film before. Paul Thomas Anderson is my favourite director so I am in disbelief that he could put out such an abomination of a film. I wish I'd spent that two and a half hours rewatching Boogie Nights. Please do not watch this film. I deeply regret ever watching it.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
"chrisbriggs3"
1.0 out of 5 stars One Star
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 18 July 2015
Verified Purchase
Whoever mixed/dubbed the dialogue for this movie should hang their head in shame..
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Billt
1.0 out of 5 stars don't mumble
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 30 March 2016
Verified Purchase
couldn't understand a word the actors said
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
The Artist
1.0 out of 5 stars Inherent Vice. Inherent &$*#.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 4 March 2017
Verified Purchase
I don't recall the last time I switched off a film halfway through... oh wait, yes I do, it was last week and it was this one.

From the trailer it appeared to be a cleverly written story with long conversations in the style of Tarantino, but it's so very far from that. After the opening scene where the guy with the mutton chops (I forget their names because the characters aren't memorable) mentions something about trying to find his ex-wife, you would expect that to be the plot. But it's not, because there doesn't seem to be one. The following scenes don't seem to link to the first scene and he ends up talking to 'Spanish Brad Pitt', Benicio Del Toro about a ship, then he speaks Reece Witherspoon about something or other that also doesn't matter. Then he gets framed for a murder at a whorehouse, but that's kind of shrugged off, then I went to get a glass of water.

When I returned it was still on, so I did a long sigh and checked the box again.

The mutton chops guy goes to see a lady with big teeth and gets handed a photo of her baby, which results in a genuinely funny reaction from him. You can see that on the trailer, so don't think I'm recommending anything based on that.

After four hours, at around the one hour mark, I was starting to regret buying the film. I know it's supposed to be drug-fuelled and a little incoherent, but it's completely unwatchable because it's too much that way.

My advice is to get the book, because it doesn't give off the same fumes when you burn it.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Inherent Vice

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Corporate Information
  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Independently Publish with Us
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Drive with Amazon Flex
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Associates Program
  • Host an Amazon Hub
Let Us Help You
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Delivery Rates & Policies
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Help
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
And don't forget:
  • Amazon Advertising
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Goodreads
  • Shopbop
  • Conditions of Use & Sale
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads Notice
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates